Get your own free workspace
  • 30 Minute Maintenance Window, Midnight Pacific, Sat May 19. Learn more.

View
 

old issues with the DBMM Commentary

Page history last edited by Lawrence Greaves 4 months ago Saved with comment

This page contains an archive of issues with the DBMM Commentary that have been addressed. These are classified as either "Fixed" or "Not an Issue".


Fixed

Fixed in Commentary version 4.1.4

Treating Concealed Commands as Off-table

Number: 5

Description:

Regarding the commentary, one aspect which I believe is incorrect is

the treatment of concealed commands - the commentary believes they

should be treated as if 'off the table' (commentary pages 14 & 22) and

get a different coloured PIP dice.  However the rules (see page 26)

clearly state the situations in which a command dices independently.

Nowhere do the rules mention 'concealed command' but  flank marches,

delayed commands, dead generals and broken commands are specifically

mentioned.  IMO the committee got this one wrong and I'd be interested

to hear other opinions.

Notes: see http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/DBMMlist/message/78855 for reasons & discussion

dbmmlist message number: (Andrew F    Date: Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:39 pm ((PDT))

Commentary version number: 16 July 2008


 

Missing re-formatting of bullets for Irregular Ineptness 

Number: 1

Description: The

Notes: (some tracking information on status, updates etc)

dbmmlist message number: (a significant message in a thread about this issue, eg Phil Barker's response or the first message in a thread)

Commentary version number: 16 July 2008


Suggestion for tighter wording on discovery of HO

Number: 2

Description:Doug M posted this on the dbmmlist

My wording would be that

"if a single element move reaches or crosses hidden obstacles, the HO

are revealed and must be placed at the completion of that move.

If a group move reaches or crosses hidden obstacles, the HO are revealed

and must be placed at the completion of that group move."

Notes: (some tracking information on status, updates etc)

dbmmlist message number: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:03 pm ((PDT))

Commentary version number:16 July 2008


Suggestion for tighter wording on no impetuous moves by troops of disheartened command

Number: 3

Description:The current commentary text confuses impetuous and making a spontaneous advance

Notes: (some tracking information on status, updates etc)

dbmmlist message number: err, sometime in late July/early Aug 08

Commentary version number: 16 July 2008


Committee Decided it Was Not an Issue

 

Considered for Commentary Version 4.1.4

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.